It seems you didn't understand at all what I explained. S2F doesn't do what it claims it does. The first principle that is claimed to be used can be used to describe a falling object do you get that? Yes or not?

So it is obvious that is not using any first principle at all. It is a deception, not conscious likely but it is still one.

It doesn't have anything to do with scarcity. You fanatics of the scarcity model still don't get it.

It is also part of doing science to point out why other models do not work. Your idea that n is changed also shows you don't know how the model works.

We have written other articles in Medium where we show n is stable. The changes in n are due to where you do the fitting not anything wrong with the model.

The n oscillates around a fixed value so one can easily take the average one. These are the usual comments from people who do not do this for a living and they think they know what they talk about when they don't. Frank did his article long ago and it is obvious BTC doesn't follow exponential growth. It is absurd to think that because people have their own models one should not analyze and find fatal flaws in them. What is going on with this new generation that thinks every issue is a social justice issue? It is sickening. Do you think this science is done? Do you realize how ridiculous this statement is?